Does The IRS have a Delegation of authority?
Delegated authority is an authority obtained from another that has authority since the authority does not naturally exist.
Tax; Definition by Black’s Law Dictionary
“In a general sense, a tax is any contribution imposed by government upon individuals, for the use and service of the state”
A contribution is a Gift and to impose is to trick by deception
1. The citizen of the United States the gov't says all Americans are isn't implicated by statute (Congress/law) as the subject of the income tax in Tax Code chapter 1. Only in regulation is there any reference to such citizenship as the subject of the tax, in violation of the 16th Amdt. which authorizes on Congress to impose an income tax; it has to be by statute.
2. Under the law, all property is a cost, then the executive branch and courts simply mandate that an exclusion from cost shall be personal services, which moves your pay from the cost column into the profit column to be taxed. This is a violation of Tax Code § 83, 212, 1001, 1011, and 1012.
4 U.S. Code § 72 - Public offices; at seat of Government
All offices attached to the seat of government shall be exercised in the District of Columbia, and not elsewhere, except as otherwise expressly provided by law.
(July 30, 1947, ch. 389, 61 Stat. 643.)
If You are having issues with the IRS this is a MUST Read.
How the IRS Scam Works (quick version)
The first thing to know is that “Internal Revenue” is a government agency and is under the scope of Title 26.
The “Internal Revenue Service” is a private for-Profit Corporation and is under the scope of Title 15.
THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE gives you their docs that you fill out, or they fill out. They then give the docs to THE INTERNAL REVENUE which says, "Oh look this guy owes us this money". THE INTERNAL REVENUE then gets a nihil dicit judgment making the debt valid and turns the bill over to the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, a private for-profit collection agency, for collection. You then fight THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE on the validity, which was already covertly adjudicated, under Title 26. The judge considers you insane since he knows Title 26 has nothing to do with THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and ONLY concerns itself with THE INTERNAL REVENUE.
This would be like taking something you bought at WAL MART back to K-MART.
This is also exactly what ALL other debt collection companies do for their vendors.
Lect. law: JUDGMENT BY NIL DICIT, is one rendered against a defendant for want of a plea. The plaintiff obtains a rule on the defendant to plead within a time specified, of which he serves a notice on the defendant or his attorney; if the defendant neglect to enter a plea within the time specified, the plaintiff may sign judgment against him.
If you talk with a Tax Lawyer about this or anything on this page they will use word games/tricks to try and convince you that you do not "understand", if you hold your ground they will resort to their only trick left; to attempt to shame you by calling you names.
The Code says this
(well the code is the IRS's interpretation of the Law, not the Law)
It is an honor to be a Citizen, Taxpayer, etc.
(you must volunteer to be a Citizen, Taxpayer, etc. NOT LAW )
We call that being a "Tax Protester"
(that's right this sounds familiar; conspiracy theorist, anti-vaxer,
climate denier, Trust the Science, why would they lie, etc)
Bonus Gift Here
* *UNRESTRICTED CLAIM OF RIGHT* * 1939 26 USC 1341
If you are assessed as a 1099 person or are self-employed or you are a salaried W-2 person, you must learn about IRS code 1341. Why? because this code will help you to stop the IRS dead in their tracks regarding any IRS liens, levies, or garnishments and allow you two major legal deductions that most of us have absolutely no clue about.
This code states: We have the "UNRESTRICTED CLAIM OF RIGHT" to not only all of our normally allowed deductions but also to be able to deduct all our "COST OF LABOR AND OR SALARY" as a deduction. So what does this mean to all of us????
It means folks that after you have taken all your normal deductions, any so-called taxable income leftover can be written off as your COST OF LABOR.
!!!! Does this mean you 0 out your tax return ???
YES !!!!!! and it's even legal and very very legitimate.
So legal that the IRS has taken great pains to keep us from learning this truth. In fact, if you read the current section of 1341 under Title 26 you will not find written what I just told you. However, you will find a small notation stating: Please see also Title 26 Section 1341 of the 1939 CFR.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1341
Isn't that nice of them to delete the most important part of the code and make us have to look it up in the 1939 CFR edition? And just how easy is it to find a ‘39 codebook, well try and find one. Even most of your legal libraries will not carry one. It is next to impossible to find one, thus you cannot find out about your legal "UNRESTRICTED CLAIM OF RIGHT" that allows you to legally deduct your cost of labor and or salaries.
So for those of you who have problems regarding past years and are being assessed fines, interest, penalties, and are owing terrible amounts of taxes, cheer up. You can now legally amend your tax return for the years in question and 0 out all of your so-called tax liabilities and end all of your hassles with the IRS legally, including the immediate end of all liens, levies, or garnishments that have been assessed.
Oh, and by the way for those of you who have paid any amount of taxes in the last three years, once you have legally amended your tax returns for these years you will get back all of your back taxes paid out at a return rate of 8% compounded interest no less. Also, let it be known that all IRS tax centers have a special section set aside to process all 1341 applications under schedule A. Why? Because 6411d of the CRF requires them to process all 1341s in 90 days or less and to get rid of all liens, levies, or garnishments that are applicable.
THEY JUST BROKE THE U.S. TAX SYSTEM WITH THE NEW INCOME TAX LAW
It plainly states that the Constitutional Authority for the enactment of the new income tax law enacted under H.R. 1, is not the 16th Amendment at all, but relies solely on "ARTICLE I, SECTION 8, CLAUSE 1 of the Constitution of the United States." for its authority.
Article I
Section 8
Clause 1
-
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
Article I
Section 9
Clause 1
-
The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.
Clause 4
-
No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken.
Clause 8 (all Doctors and B.A.R. Members Holding Office are in Violation)
-
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.
26 U.S. Code § 83 - Property transferred in connection with performance of services
(a)General rule
If, in connection with the performance of services, property is transferred to any person other than the person for whom such services are performed, the excess of—
(1) the fair market value of such property (determined without regard to any restriction other than a restriction which by its terms will never lapse) at the first time the rights of the person having the beneficial interest in such property are transferable or are not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, whichever occurs earlier, over
(2) the amount (if any) paid for such property,
shall be included in the gross income of the person who performed such services in the first taxable year in which the rights of the person having the beneficial interest in such property are transferable or are not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, whichever is applicable. The preceding sentence shall not apply if such person sells or otherwise disposes of such property in an arm’s length transaction before his rights in such property become transferable or not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture.
Tax Code § 83 explains how to tax compensation for services but the IRS, DOJ, and the courts refuse to go on record with the government's own interpretation of it because it contains immense protections; only the excess over the "amount paid" is gross income.
Tax Code § 83 explains how to tax compensation for services but the IRS, DOJ, and the courts refuse to go on record with the government's own interpretation of it because it contains immense protections; only the excess over the "amount paid" is gross income.
Youtube Video
Youtube Channel Take From Cesar
26 U.S. Code § 83 - Property transferred in connection with performance of services
(a)General rule
If, in connection with the performance of services, property is transferred to any person other than the person for whom such services are performed, the excess of—
(1) the fair market value of such property (determined without regard to any restriction other than a restriction which by its terms will never lapse) at the first time the rights of the person having the beneficial interest in such property are transferable or are not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, whichever occurs earlier, over
(2) the amount (if any) paid for such property,
shall be included in the gross income of the person who performed such services in the first taxable year in which the rights of the person having the beneficial interest in such property are transferable or are not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, whichever is applicable. The preceding sentence shall not apply if such person sells or otherwise disposes of such property in an arm’s length transaction before his rights in such property become transferable or not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture.
The above are 2 sentences (let's put them together)
If, in connection with the performance of services, property is transferred to any person other than the person for whom such services are performed, the excess of the fair market value of such property at the first time the rights of the person having the beneficial interest in such property are transferable or are not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, whichever occurs earlier, over the amount (if any) paid for such property, shall be included in the gross income of the person who performed such services in the first taxable year in which the rights of the person having the beneficial interest in such property are transferable or are not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, whichever is applicable.
The preceding sentence shall not apply if such person sells or otherwise disposes of such property in an arm’s length transaction before his rights in such property become transferable or not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture.
Shortened Version (a Keith version)
If you are paid for performing a job/service, and “money / or a property of value” is given to you for doing said job/service, “The Amount Over” the agreed-upon amount (if there is any) will be Your Gross Income in the 1st taxable year you receive ownership of said “money / or a property of value”. This does not apply if sell/get rid of property before you receive it.
I agreed to work for 50k a year I received 50k for my work nothing over the agreed amount. My gross Income for the Federal Government is...
ZERO, Nada, Zippo, Nunca.
Case Law
Case law is law that is based on judicial decisions rather than law based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. ... Case law, also used interchangeably with common law, refers to the collection of precedents and authority set by previous judicial decisions on a particular issue or topic.
"There, every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowman without his consent." ~ Cruden v. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E.
“All laws, rules, and practices are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” ~Marbury v. Madison, 5th US (2 cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803).
"The common law is the real law, the supreme Law of the land, the code rules, regulations, policy and statutes are "not the law". ~Self v. Rhay, 61 Wn (2d) 261 (1963)
“Constitutional rights may not be infringed simply because the majority of the people choose that they be”. ~Westbrook v. Mihaly 2 C3d 756 (1970)
"All codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities only, not human/Creators in accordance with God's laws. All codes, rules, and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process... " ~Rodrigues v. Ray Donavan (U.S. Department of Labor) 769 F.2d 1344, 1348 (1985)